Sunday, January 27, 2013

Summary v. Analysis
    While summarizing a book the goal and intent is to give some details about the basic story line while still not giving it away. The summary should be a brief and vague outline so as to not ruin any surprises for the reader. It should grab the readers attention enough to get them interested in the book but not give too many details as to make them feel like they just read the book.
    For example: Here is a summary of the book “Dead of Winter” by P.J. Parrish. In the book “Dead of Winter” there is a police officer named Louis Kincaid. He is moved up to small town after fighting crime in a large city. The book brings many twists as Louis is on a hunt to find a dangerous killer. Through love, anger, heartbreak, and happiness Louis continues on his quest of crime fighting and problem solving with much motivation.
    How the summary of this compares to an analysis would be if one said that “Dead of Winter” was a story about how one should never trust a woman. While this is a small theme about the story, in the grand scheme of things it is a point that could be intensely argued. In the analysis one would still give some brief synopsis of the story they would mostly focus in on arguing that the story is mostly about never trusting a woman.
    Summary’s and Analysis’ are both very different. While both give a brief explanation of the story, a summary would mostly focus on giving someone a short and vague explanation of the story without going into detail. Where as an analysis would give a lot more details while also making an argument over one specific theme in the story.

Saturday, January 19, 2013

         Nabokov's Good Readers and Good Writers was a great piece for thinking about what really makes a good reader. Nabokov expresses that what makes a good reader is the artistic approach to reading. In his work he describes having an "impersonal imagination and artistic delight. He goes on to explain a balance between the reader and writer, and how this balance will help dictate how good the reader is. He also mentions the temperament of a good reader with it being one who has a good balance of a artistic and scientific mind.
          I certainly agree with Nabokov's artistic view on reading. I believe that a the main characteristic of a good reader is not only one who can comprehend the words they are reading, but also put themselves into the story with an artistic mind. For me; if I do not feel like I can put myself into the story and imagine and feel like I am the character in the story I find it hard to get lost in the book. Being someone with an artistic mind I do believe that I am a good reader. The stories I have read where I have been able to get lost and feel like I am the character in the book are the stories I have always remembered.
Vladimir Nabokov